Functionally degraded areas | Environmental indicators

Languages

Indicators Years

2020

2018

2013

Take a look

Transportation and climate change

In Slovenia, conventional vehicle propulsion is strongly predominant

Are Slovenians considering buying an electric car?

We can notice positive trends towards the revitalization of FDAs, as new activity has taken off on 108 locations, on the 292 FDAs there have been major changes in recent years, where many remediation and renewal processes began, while else ware the physical condition and degradation of the area has deteriorated.

There is a lack of a systematic approach to environmental remediation and renovation, especially of those FDAs where old environmental burdens are present, as well as the establishment of a spatial development system that will tend to “no net land take” of agricultural and forest land.

Charts

Figure TP02-1: Changes on FDAs in the period from 2017 to 2020

Sources:

Show data


	No changes[%]	Bigger changes on a FDA[%]	FDA back in function[%]	New FDA[%]
2017-2020	55	23	9	13

Export Table Data

Figure TP02-2: The number of functionally degraded areas by the type of degradation, September 2017 and March 2020

Sources:

Show data


	2020[number]	2017[number]
FDA of industrial and craft activities (IND)	216	237
FDA of infrastructures (INF)	160	133
FDA of agricultural activities (AGR)	83	77
FDA of defence, protection and rescue services (DEF)	37	35
FDA of transitional use (TRANS)	123	112
FDA of mineral extraction (MIN)	181	170
FDA of service activities (SERV)	179	162
FDA of tourist, sports and recreation activities (TOUR)	64	60
FDA for housing (HOU)	89	95

Export Table Data

Figure TP02-3: The size of functionally degraded areas, September 2017 and March 2020

Sources:

Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Degraded areas database, 2017, 2020. (2020)

Show data


	2020[ha]	2017[ha]
FDA of industrial and craft activities (IND)	1125.82	1196.94
FDA of infrastructures (INF)	465.44	418.39
FDA of agricultural activities (AGR)	234.39	202.33
FDA of defence, protection and rescue services (DEF)	170.34	152.11
FDA of transitional use (TRANS)	285.07	267.76
FDA of mineral extraction (MIN)	810.76	649.90
FDA of service activities (SERV)	356.35	324.34
FDA of tourist, sports and recreation activities (TOUR)	131.65	102.17
FDA for housing (HOU)	115.45	108.79

Export Table Data

Figure TP02-4: Area of functionally degraded areas by ownership, September 2017 and March 2020

Sources:

Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Degraded areas database, 2017, 2020. (2020)

Show data


	2020[ha]	2017[ha]
public	464.86	465.33
mixed ownership	1737.27	988.66
private	1455.34	1641.64
unknown	37.80	327.10

Export Table Data

Figure TP02-5: Area of functionally degraded areas by degree of abandonment, September 2017 and March 2020

Sources:

Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Degraded areas database, 2017, 2020. (2020)

Show data


	2020[ha]	2017[ha]
partially abandoned	1074.71	900.39
moderately abandoned	1492.14	1373.76
completely abandoned	1128.42	1148.60

Export Table Data

Figure TP02-6: Expected recovery plans of FDAs by statistical regions, 2020

Sources:

Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Degraded areas database, 2020. (2020)

Show data


	there are no real plans and options for change[number]	we have plans and ideas, the realization has not yet been defined[number]	we already have an area plan in place for an area[number]
Goriška	23	39	7
Jugovzhodna Slovenija	42	24	18
Koroška	22	24	8
Obalno-kraška	21	35	25
Osrednjeslovenska	193	106	64
Podravska	56	31	14
Pomurska	47	18	10
Posavska	21	9	11
Primorsko-notranjska	13	14	12
Savinjska	36	35	20
Zasavska	28	22	4