KAZALCI OKOLJA

Environmental indicators in Slovenia


Environmental indicators are based on graphs, maps and assessments and as such present environmental trends in Slovenia. The indicators represent one of the four pillars of our environmental reporting, and are prepared in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act. The Environmental Indicators in Slovenia website enables users to browse among 180 indicators. They are based on numerical data and they indicate the state, characteristics and trends of environmental development in Slovenia. They are prepared using a systematic approach based on data and monitoring, as shown in the information pyramid.

Did you know?

Neutral

Emission productivity in Slovenia has improved in 2020. Compared to the EU, progress in the field of emission productivity in Slovenia is still too slow. Despite the progress made in the last two years, the link between economic development and measures to reduce GHG emissions needs to be further strengthened.

Good

The cumulative final energy savings due to the implementation of energy efficiency (EE) and renewable energy source (RES) measures in the residential sector amounted to 1,750 GWh by 2020, and the cumulative CO2 emissions reduction was 273 kt. Compared to the previous year, energy savings decreased by 10% and the reduction in CO2 emissions by 6%. In 2020, the cumulative final energy savings were 25% and the cumulative CO2 emissions reduction 2% above the annual target. The 2020 targets were thus achieved.

Bad

In 2020, CO2 intensity in the commercial and institutional sector increased further compared to the previous year, to 33 t CO2/million EUR1995, and lagged 0.7 percentage points behind the annual target value. The 2020 target was thus not achieved which is due to a 3.8% reduction in value added caused by the implementation of measures for preventing the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In comparison to 2010, the intensity was 55% lower.

Good

At the end of 2020, the total floor area of energy-renovated buildings in the public sector amounted to 1.84 million m2, which exceeds the annual target by 3%. The 2020 target was thus achieved. In 2020, 127,000 m2 of the total floor area were renovated, which is almost a third less than the previous year and also significantly less than in the period 2013−2015.

Bad

By 2020, the implementation of energy efficiency (EE) and renewable energy source (RES) measures in the public sector resulted in a cumulative energy savings of 228 GWh, and the cumulative CO2 emissions reduction was 56 kt. The values of both indicators lagged behind the annual target values by 26% and 12%, respectively. The 2020 targets were thus not achieved, which is largely due to the insufficient intensity of investments in the period 2015–2017.

Bad

In 2020, the leverage of incentives in the public sector amounted to 34.4 euro cents of subsidy for 1 euro of investment and lagged behind the annual target value by 1.1 euro cents. The 2020 target was thus not achieved. Compared to the previous year, 2.2 euro cents less subsidy had to be allocated for 1 euro of investment, which was caused by the reduction of the financial leverage of Eco Fund incentives by 4.1 euro cents.


SLEDI NAM

TWITTER